Phase 4: Action.
Differences between teach and mediate pedagogically
Teaching:
it is the transmission of information and knowledge from the teacher to the
students. Teaching allows the students to assimilate content and accumulate
knowledge.
According to Contreras (2013), there are two
approaches applied to teaching:
Passive transmission: students
are considered as recipients who, through o imitation and reiteration, will be
able to reproduce the knowledge that was transmitted to them.
•
Learners
are passive elements.
•
The teacher's job is to repeat and make the students repeat.
•
Learning
is conceived as cumulative, successive, and continuous.
•
Oral
and visual exposure of the teacher is privileged.
•
The
student must limit himself/herself to imitate, attend, and correct.
Active
school: the teacher interaction is intended to
promote manipulation, and experimentation by students.
•
Teacher
focuses on guide, promote, and support the learning.
•
The
students build their knowledge.
•
The
important thing is that the student develops abilities and skills for life.
•
The
student is the core.
•
Educational
materials designed for students play a central role
Mediating: it is a form of interaction that allows the
mediators to help the learners to develop their learning potential, and to
assimilate learning strategies, through regular contact with them. It is the
process between the knowledge that the student possesses and the knowledge that
he is intended to acquire. A mediator is a guide in the construction of
knowledge of each student. The pupils must be the protagonist of their learning
process through mediation and self-discovery.
According to Contreras (2013), there is an approach
applied to mediation:
•
Reconstruction
of knowledge: It takes into account the types and ways of learning of students
•
With
the teacher´s support, the student appropriates scientific knowledge.
•
Significant
learning
•
A
mediator must do her/his self-evaluation and self-correction to adapt his
methodology to the needs of the students
The implementation process of the action plan
During four (4) weeks I had the
opportunity to increase the motivation and interest of the students in the
class, through a proposal, which contains short activities, that allowed the
learners to feel more engaged with the class funnily and interestingly. The
idea was to use technology and the internet to foster the development of
specific language skills.
Richards
(2014) has pointed out that “today, the internet, technology and the media, and
the use of English in face-to-face, as well as virtual social networks provide
greater opportunities for meaningful
and authentic language
use than are
available in the
classroom (p. 2)”.
Changes in interactions with students.
I have changed the way that I used
to prepare the classes because I was usually worried about the contents, but
during the last month of the academic year, I was concerned about the minutes
of the class that I was going to spend doing a special activity, according to
the proposal that I have designed.
Actually,
it was rewarding to observe that most of the students focus on the activity and
I could catch their attention with a simple game, riddle, fable, video, and so
on. Of course, after the short activity,
my students come back to the class willing to learn something new much more
motivated and it makes me feel glad.
Resources you have used
The
student’s feelings about the process
A short
video about the process
Phase 4_Action from Olga Milena on Vimeo.
Link: https://vimeo.com/483861068
My
feelings about the process
The proposal has allowed me to
understand that my job as a teacher goes beyond the English contents. Hence, I
need to reflect on students´ purposes and goals in order to create joyful
learning environments. Thus, I need to move from my comfort zone and take risks
in the classroom trying innovative pedagogical techniques that promote the
process of learning in a pleasant and meaningful way.
Most
of the time I have been influenced by the Passive transmission approach, in
which learning is based on the transmission of knowledge to the student, but
each day I have been reflecting that it isn´t the right way of teaching, and
the proposal has been an excellent tool, as a source of inspiration for new
insight and more innovative possibilities about the overall understanding of
what learning and teaching are.
References
Contreras, I. (2013). De la
enseñanza a la mediación ¿Cambio de paradigma o cambio de nombre? In Revista Educación 19(2), pp. 5-15. Recovered
from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/8452/7979
Delgado, A. (2013). Pedagogical
Mediation and Learning. En Revista de Lenguas Modernas, N° 19, 2013, pp.
513-522 / ISSN: 1659-1933. Recovered
from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rlm/article/view/14033/13339
Richards, J. (2014). The Changing
Face of Language Learning: Learning Beyond the Classroom. In RELC Journal, Vol
45, 1, pp.1-18. Recovered from https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Changing-Face-of-Language-Learning-RELC.pdf
Richards, J. (2013). Creativity
in Language Teaching. Plenary address at University of Hong Kong, 5th June
2013. University of Hong Kong. Recovered from https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Creativity-in-Language-Teaching.pdf
Tebar, L. (2011). El perfil del profesor mediador de aprendizajes. In El profesor mediador del aprendizaje (2nd ed., pp. 99–128). Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Magisterio. Recovered from http://bibliotecadigital.magisterio.co.bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/libro/el-profesor-mediador-del-aprendizaje-0
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario